Zendesk · AI product · Mid · 60 to 90 minutes

Zendesk AI Agent Trust and Handoff Design

Zendesk makes customer service software that helps businesses manage support across tickets, messaging, help centers, and automation. Answer this product management case and get it graded line by line against a weighted rubric.

The situation

Your director of product for Zendesk AI has asked you to propose how the AI support agent should decide when to answer a customer directly, when to ask clarifying questions, and when to hand the conversation to a human agent. The ask comes after several large customers said they like the lower volume from automation, but they are worried that occasional wrong answers are harder to spot than no answer at all. Sales is hearing that trust, not feature breadth, is becoming the main blocker in some enterprise deals. Support leadership also says current reporting overstates success because a contained conversation is not always a correctly resolved one. Assume the following numbers for a mixed set of Zendesk customers: the AI agent attempts 40% of inbound support conversations, fully contains 24%, and about 7% of contained conversations later reopen, escalate, or receive clear negative feedback tied to a bad answer. You own this product area for digital support channels. The tension is that more aggressive automation improves efficiency and helps smaller teams, but a single confident wrong answer can damage customer trust, brand safety, and willingness to expand AI use.

What to produce

A 1 to 2 page product proposal.

Your answer must

Constraints

Format

Structure your answer with sections for scope, decision logic, metrics, roadmap, and rollout. Be explicit about trade-offs, thresholds, and what would cause the AI to step back from answering.

Related case studies

Keep practising