AI & Technical question
Glean can pull structured and unstructured data from systems like ServiceNow, Zendesk, GitHub, and Microsoft Teams. If you were building a leader-facing intelligence feature on top of that data, what architecture and launch tradeoffs would you make around permissions, identity resolution, data freshness, source reliability, personalization, and explainability?
- Glean
- AI & Technical
- Hard
Practice this question out loud. An AI interviewer asks it, follows up like a real interviewer would, and scores your answer. Type or speak.
Start a mock interview on this question · Mock interview from a job description
What this question tests
Tests systems level thinking on architecture and launch tradeoffs for a cross source leader facing intelligence feature built on enterprise data.
How to approach it
- Clarify the target insight, for example a leader facing summary of team blockers pulled from ServiceNow, Zendesk, GitHub, and Teams.
- Design around permissions first, since the feature must respect the most restrictive access a user has across every underlying system.
- Address identity resolution, matching a person's handles across systems, and decide how confident a match must be before merging activity.
- Weigh freshness against reliability, since GitHub updates near real time while ServiceNow may batch sync, so staleness must be shown per source.
- Build explainability in from day one, always showing which source record backs a claim, since leaders will not act on an unexplained conclusion.
What a strong answer includes
- Treats permissions as a hard architectural constraint, filtering at the most restrictive source level rather than aggregating first and filtering later.
- Calls out identity resolution as a real risk, since a low confidence match could merge two people's activity, and proposes a conservative threshold.
- Proposes surfacing freshness explicitly, labeling an insight as current as of a given time when one source lags.
- Ties explainability to trust, linking every insight back to the specific tickets or messages that generated it.
Common mistakes
- Designing the aggregation pipeline before solving permissions, which risks leaking access across systems.
- Treating all source systems as equally fresh and reliable instead of accounting for sync lag and data quality differences.
Likely follow-up questions
- How would you handle a low confidence identity match in practice?
- What would you do if one source system's data was frequently wrong?
More ai & technical questions
- How would you measure whether Glean's AI answers are accurate and well-cited?Glean · AI & Technical · Medium
- How would you design a governance model that behaves consistently across Glean's UI, public APIs, and heterogeneous enterprise connectors, for example, a shared policy layer for permissions, action scopes, audit logging, and redaction, even when source systems expose different authentication models and data granularity?Glean · AI & Technical · Hard
- A Fortune 500 customer asks for an audit trail for every AI-agent answer: which data sources were accessed, which permissions were applied, why the response was generated, and whether sensitive content was filtered or redacted. Design the admin and end-user experience, and the core APIs/data model needed to support this without overwhelming either audience.Glean · AI & Technical · Hard
- Several enterprise customers report that the ServiceNow and GitHub connectors are ingesting data successfully, but search results and assistant answers still feel incomplete or low quality. How would you diagnose where the breakdown is across crawl freshness, permissions sync, metadata extraction, entity mapping, ranking, and UX, and how would you decide which fixes to ship first?Glean · AI & Technical · Hard
- Design the next version of Glean’s Indexing API and custom connector platform for large enterprises that need to bring proprietary data sources online quickly. What core capabilities would you prioritize, such as schema/modeling, auth and permissions, incremental sync, observability, and governance, and what principles would you use to keep the platform flexible without creating an inconsistent product experience?Glean · AI & Technical · Hard
- Glean Model Hub lets enterprise customers choose among LLMs for search, assistant, and agent workflows. How would you build a model-provider evaluation framework to decide which new providers to add, including the gating criteria, offline/online evals, and the tradeoffs you would make across answer quality, latency, security, cost, and enterprise-specific requirements?Glean · AI & Technical · Hard
More questions from Glean
Learn the skill behind it
Chapters of the AI PM course that teach what this question tests.
- Chapter 1: Foundations: the model and the decisions it forces on you
- Chapter 8: Evals: define good and make the number defensible
- Chapter 6: Agents and agentic architecture