Metrics question

As a PM candidate, how would you measure if LinkedIn is better for iOS or android, given that the look and feel is same across both platforms?

Practice this question out loud. An AI interviewer asks it, follows up like a real interviewer would, and scores your answer. Type or speak.

Start a mock interview on this question · Mock interview from a job description

What this question tests

Metrics thinking for cross platform parity: measuring quality difference when the surface UI looks identical on both platforms.

How to approach it

  1. Clarify the definition of 'better': performance, engagement, or platform-specific technical quality, since look and feel is explicitly ruled out.
  2. State the goal: even with identical UI, underlying performance and platform constraints can differ significantly.
  3. Build a metric tree covering: crash rate and app not responding rate per platform, load and page render times, and feature parity (features shipped to one platform first).
  4. Add engagement metrics per platform: session length, session frequency, and feature adoption rate, normalized by user demographics since iOS and Android skew differently.
  5. Control for confounders: iOS and Android user bases differ by region and income, so compare cohorts with similar demographics, not raw averages.
  6. Set a north star, such as day 30 retention by platform after controlling for these demographic differences.

What a strong answer includes

Common mistakes

Likely follow-up questions

More metrics questions

More questions from LinkedIn

Learn the skill behind it

Chapters of the AI PM course that teach what this question tests.

Preparing for a specific role?

Book summaries for this kind of question

Browse all 4,000+ questions in the bank