Strategy question

Gemini and Search both answer questions. How do you avoid cannibalizing Search ad revenue?

Practice this question out loud. An AI interviewer asks it, follows up like a real interviewer would, and scores your answer. Type or speak.

Start a mock interview on this question · Mock interview from a job description

What this question tests

Strategic tension between two products in the same portfolio competing for the same query intent and ad revenue.

How to approach it

  1. State the core tension: a direct AI answer in Gemini can resolve a user's need without any ad-supported search results page.
  2. Segment query intent: informational queries (facts, explanations) are most at risk of cannibalization, while commercial and navigational queries (shopping, brand lookups) still need Search's ad-driven results.
  3. Propose differentiated experiences by intent: Gemini answers informational queries directly, while Search keeps its results page and ads for commercial intent.
  4. Introduce new ad formats within AI answers themselves, such as clearly labeled sponsored suggestions or product placements within a Gemini answer, similar to how AI Overviews are evolving.
  5. Reframe the metric that matters: total advertiser value across both surfaces combined, rather than protecting Search's legacy click-through model in isolation.
  6. Define success as stable or growing total ad revenue across Search and Gemini combined, even if Search's standalone click volume declines.

What a strong answer includes

Common mistakes

Likely follow-up questions

More strategy questions

More questions from Google DeepMind

Learn the skill behind it

Chapters of the AI PM course that teach what this question tests.

Preparing for a specific role?

Book summaries for this kind of question

Browse all 4,000+ questions in the bank