Product design question

How would you improve Sierra's AI agents to resolve more customer issues without escalation?

Practice this question out loud. An AI interviewer asks it, follows up like a real interviewer would, and scores your answer. Type or speak.

Start a mock interview on this question · Mock interview from a job description

What this question tests

Product improvement for a conversational AI agent product, focused on the core outcome metric of resolution without human handoff.

How to approach it

  1. Define the current gap: identify the top reasons agents escalate today, such as ambiguous customer intent, missing account context, or policy edge cases the agent is not confident handling.
  2. Improve intent understanding: add clarifying-question flows so the agent asks for missing detail instead of escalating on ambiguity.
  3. Expand safe autonomy: give the agent access to more account and order context (with proper permissions) so it can resolve issues that today require a human to look something up.
  4. Add confidence-based fallback: when the agent is uncertain, have it attempt a best resolution with a clear confirmation step rather than immediately escalating.
  5. Build a continuous improvement loop, reviewing a sample of escalated conversations weekly to identify new automatable patterns.
  6. Define success as resolution rate without escalation, paired with a customer satisfaction guardrail, since faster resolution without satisfaction is a false win.

What a strong answer includes

Common mistakes

Likely follow-up questions

More product design questions

More questions from Sierra

Learn the skill behind it

Chapters of the AI PM course that teach what this question tests.

Preparing for a specific role?

Book summaries for this kind of question

Browse all 4,000+ questions in the bank