Product design question
Design a refrigerator for the blind.
- Product design
- Hard
Practice this question out loud. An AI interviewer asks it, follows up like a real interviewer would, and scores your answer. Type or speak.
Start a mock interview on this question · Mock interview from a job description
What this question tests
Tests accessible/inclusive product design: identifying real barriers blind users face with a visual appliance and designing around non-visual senses.
How to approach it
- Clarify the user: someone who is fully blind, using screen readers and tactile/audio cues daily, versus low-vision users who may still use some visual contrast.
- Identify pain points with a normal fridge: can't read expiration dates, can't see what's inside without touching everything, can't read temperature/settings displays, can't tell what's about to spoil.
- Prioritize by frequency and safety: expiration/spoilage detection is a safety issue (food poisoning risk), so prioritize it over convenience features.
- Propose design: voice-controlled interface for settings and inventory queries, audio labels via smart tags/RFID scanned on entry (integrated with a phone app using text-to-speech), and audio alerts for items nearing expiration.
- Address interaction: tactile braille labels on shelves for organization, plus consistent voice feedback confirming door open/closed and temperature status.
- Define success: reduction in spoiled/wasted food reported by blind users, and task completion time for 'find an item' compared to a sighted user baseline.
What a strong answer includes
- Prioritizes safety (expiration/spoilage detection) over cosmetic accessibility features, showing sound judgment on what matters most.
- Proposes a concrete tech mechanism (RFID/smart tags plus voice interface) rather than vague 'make it accessible' language.
- Combines multiple accessible modalities (audio and tactile/braille), recognizing blind users vary in their preferred interaction mode.
- Defines a success metric tied to the real risk (food waste/spoilage) rather than generic satisfaction.
Common mistakes
- Treating accessibility as an afterthought UI tweak (bigger fonts) rather than a fundamentally different interaction model.
- Ignoring the safety dimension (spoiled food, expired medication storage) which is the highest-stakes pain point.
- Assuming all blind users behave the same way, ignoring the existence of low-vision users with partial sight.
Likely follow-up questions
- How would you validate this design with actual blind users before building it?
- How would this integrate with existing screen reader ecosystems (VoiceOver, TalkBack)?
- What would you prioritize first if the budget only covered one feature?
More product design questions
- Design a TV for a car.Google · Product design · Hard
- How do you design a camera for the elderly?Google · Product design · Medium
- Redesign Twitter for eCommerce.Shopify · Product design · Hard
- How would you go about designing a new location sharing app for Google?Google · Product design · Medium
- How would you improve Google Home?Google · Product design · Easy
- How would you improve YouTube?Spotify · Product design · Easy
More questions from Google
Learn the skill behind it
Chapters of the AI PM course that teach what this question tests.
- Chapter 4: Discovery and strategy for AI products
- Chapter 7: AI UX and human oversight: design for a system that is wrong sometimes
- Chapter 14: Get the job: the AI PM interview loop