Strategy question
G-suite is considering to implement a malware and virus detection. How would you evaluate the decision?
- Strategy
- Hard
Practice this question out loud. An AI interviewer asks it, follows up like a real interviewer would, and scores your answer. Type or speak.
Start a mock interview on this question · Mock interview from a job description
What this question tests
Strategic decision-making with a security and business tradeoff, checking how you weigh cost, risk, and market expectations.
How to approach it
- Clarify the decision framing, whether this is a build versus buy or partner decision, and what current gap exists in G Suite's offering.
- Assess the market need, noting enterprise buyers increasingly expect built-in malware and virus scanning as a baseline requirement, especially against Microsoft's offering.
- Weigh the cost, engineering investment to build detection in-house versus licensing a third-party engine, against the risk of being seen as behind competitors.
- Consider the risk of inaction, security incidents damaging enterprise trust and slowing sales cycles in competitive deals.
- Propose a recommendation, likely partnering with or acquiring proven detection technology short term while evaluating in-house investment long term.
- Define success metrics, such as reduction in malware-related incidents and improved enterprise win rate in deals citing security as a blocker.
What a strong answer includes
- Frames this explicitly as competitive parity with Microsoft 365's built-in security, tying the decision to sales and retention risk, not just technical merit.
- Recommends a staged approach, partnering or licensing first to close the gap quickly, with build versus buy reassessed once scale is proven.
- Names a concrete cost consideration, engineering headcount and licensing fees, as part of the tradeoff, even if approximate.
- Proposes a measurable success metric tied to enterprise sales outcomes, not just detection accuracy, since the business case is what justifies investment.
Common mistakes
- Evaluating this purely as a technical feature decision without considering competitive and sales context.
- Not considering a partner or acquire option, jumping straight to a multi-year build.
- Giving no measurable way to know if the investment paid off.
Likely follow-up questions
- How would you decide between partnering, acquiring, or building this capability in-house?
- What would you measure in the first six months to know this investment was worth it?
More strategy questions
- Google Keep is a free product to save, share notes etc. How would you make it a subscription product & monetize it?Google · Strategy · Hard
- With an unlimited network bandwidth what would you build?Google · Strategy · Hard
- Strategize and implement omni-channel initiatives to improve customer LTV for Walmart.Shopify · Strategy · Hard
- Should Google launch a TV service?Google · Strategy · Hard
- Your company has been able to digitize smell, how will you launch this new service?Google · Strategy · Hard
- What should Airbnb's strategy be during the COVID-19 pandemic?Google · Strategy · Hard
More questions from Google
Learn the skill behind it
Chapters of the AI PM course that teach what this question tests.
- Chapter 4: Discovery and strategy for AI products
- Chapter 9: Prove it paid off: outcomes, economics, and pricing
- Chapter 14: Get the job: the AI PM interview loop