Strategy question
If you were the head of Azure Data Warehouse, what would you do to improve their offering?
- Strategy
- Hard
Practice this question out loud. An AI interviewer asks it, follows up like a real interviewer would, and scores your answer. Type or speak.
Start a mock interview on this question · Mock interview from a job description
What this question tests
Tests enterprise infrastructure product strategy: can you identify what actually differentiates a data warehouse offering versus its major competitors.
How to approach it
- Clarify the competitive landscape: Azure Synapse/Fabric competes with Snowflake, BigQuery, and Redshift, so the improvement plan should target a specific gap versus these.
- Identify likely weak points based on common enterprise data-warehouse complaints: cost predictability, query performance at scale, and ease of integration with existing BI and ML tooling.
- Prioritize one or two improvements: simplify pricing to be more usage-transparent like Snowflake's model, and deepen native integration with Microsoft's own ecosystem (Power BI, Fabric, Copilot) as the actual differentiator versus pure-play competitors.
- Propose a migration incentive: tooling and credits that make moving from Redshift or on-prem warehouses low-friction, since switching cost is the biggest barrier in this market.
- Address performance: invest in separating storage and compute scaling (if not already done) so customers only pay for the compute they use, matching Snowflake's core value prop.
- Define success as net new large-enterprise workloads migrated and gross margin per workload, not just raw customer count.
What a strong answer includes
- Names the actual competitive set (Snowflake, BigQuery, Redshift) instead of speaking generically about 'the market'.
- Identifies Microsoft ecosystem lock-in (Power BI, Office, Copilot) as the genuine differentiator worth doubling down on rather than competing purely on raw price.
- Gives an illustrative assumption, such as migration friction accounting for a meaningful share of lost deals, to justify prioritizing migration tooling.
- Separates a quick win (pricing transparency) from a longer bet (deeper AI/Copilot integration).
Common mistakes
- Vague answers like 'improve performance and lower cost' with no named competitor or mechanism.
- Ignoring the ecosystem advantage Microsoft actually has over pure-play warehouse vendors.
- No concrete metric to judge whether the improvements worked.
Likely follow-up questions
- How would you prioritize this against other Azure data investments?
- What would you do if a key enterprise customer threatened to migrate to Snowflake?
- How would you measure whether pricing changes actually improved competitiveness?
More strategy questions
- Google Keep is a free product to save, share notes etc. How would you make it a subscription product & monetize it?Google · Strategy · Hard
- With an unlimited network bandwidth what would you build?Google · Strategy · Hard
- Strategize and implement omni-channel initiatives to improve customer LTV for Walmart.Shopify · Strategy · Hard
- Should Google launch a TV service?Google · Strategy · Hard
- Your company has been able to digitize smell, how will you launch this new service?Google · Strategy · Hard
- What should Airbnb's strategy be during the COVID-19 pandemic?Google · Strategy · Hard
More questions from Google
Learn the skill behind it
Chapters of the AI PM course that teach what this question tests.
- Chapter 4: Discovery and strategy for AI products
- Chapter 9: Prove it paid off: outcomes, economics, and pricing
- Chapter 14: Get the job: the AI PM interview loop