Strategy question

LinkedIn CEO wants to allow anonymous posting and asks you for recommendation on whether or not they should build it. What do you say to the CEO?

Practice this question out loud. An AI interviewer asks it, follows up like a real interviewer would, and scores your answer. Type or speak.

Start a mock interview on this question · Mock interview from a job description

What this question tests

Strategic recommendation skill, weighing user value, platform trust, and moderation risk for a major feature bet.

How to approach it

  1. Clarify the goal behind the ask: likely increasing honest, vulnerable content sharing that users avoid posting under their real name.
  2. List the benefit: anonymous posting could unlock content like salary discussions or workplace concerns that LinkedIn currently suppresses.
  3. Weigh the risk: anonymity could increase toxic behavior and harassment, undermining LinkedIn's core professional trust proposition.
  4. Consider a middle path: pseudonymous posting tied to verified professional identity behind the scenes, not fully anonymous.
  5. Recommend a scoped pilot, like anonymous posting only within specific interest or company-verified groups, with strong moderation.
  6. Define success as engagement lift in honest discussion content without a rise in reported harassment.

What a strong answer includes

Common mistakes

Likely follow-up questions

More strategy questions

More questions from LinkedIn

Learn the skill behind it

Chapters of the AI PM course that teach what this question tests.

Preparing for a specific role?

Book summaries for this kind of question

Browse all 4,000+ questions in the bank