Strategy question
Should Google enter into gaming domain? e.g. Ms has xbox
- Strategy
- Hard
Practice this question out loud. An AI interviewer asks it, follows up like a real interviewer would, and scores your answer. Type or speak.
Start a mock interview on this question · Mock interview from a job description
What this question tests
Tests market-entry strategy reasoning, weighing an incumbent's core strengths against the cost and risk of entering a capital-intensive, competitive market.
How to approach it
- Clarify what entering gaming means: hardware (a console), cloud gaming service, or game publishing, since the strategy differs sharply.
- Assess Google's actual track record: Stadia, its prior cloud gaming attempt, shut down, which is a critical data point to address directly.
- Weigh Google's real advantage: cloud infrastructure and distribution (Android, Play Store) rather than hardware manufacturing, where Sony and Microsoft have decades of expertise.
- Recommend against a console and toward doubling down on Android as the world's largest gaming platform by install base, investing in Play Store discovery and cloud-assisted mobile gaming instead.
- Weigh the risk explicitly: gaming requires sustained, patient capital and content investment, which Google has previously abandoned when short-term metrics disappointed.
- Define success as engagement and revenue growth within Android gaming rather than a new standalone gaming brand.
What a strong answer includes
- Directly addresses Stadia's failure instead of ignoring it, showing awareness of the company's real history.
- Recommends leveraging Android's existing mobile gaming dominance instead of a new hardware bet, playing to Google's actual strength.
- Uses illustrative numbers as assumptions: assume mobile gaming is a larger addressable market than console gaming, favoring the Android-first path.
- Flags the real organizational risk: Google has a pattern of killing products that don't show fast traction, which matters for a long-payoff category like gaming.
Common mistakes
- Ignoring Stadia's failure, which is directly relevant precedent for this exact question.
- Proposing a console to compete head-on with Xbox and PlayStation without addressing Google's lack of hardware expertise.
- Not weighing Google's pattern of abandoning long-payoff bets.
Likely follow-up questions
- What specifically went wrong with Stadia?
- How would you convince leadership to commit long-term capital this time?
- What would the first concrete product be?
More strategy questions
- Google Keep is a free product to save, share notes etc. How would you make it a subscription product & monetize it?Google · Strategy · Hard
- With an unlimited network bandwidth what would you build?Google · Strategy · Hard
- Strategize and implement omni-channel initiatives to improve customer LTV for Walmart.Shopify · Strategy · Hard
- Should Google launch a TV service?Google · Strategy · Hard
- Your company has been able to digitize smell, how will you launch this new service?Google · Strategy · Hard
- What should Airbnb's strategy be during the COVID-19 pandemic?Google · Strategy · Hard
More questions from Google
Learn the skill behind it
Chapters of the AI PM course that teach what this question tests.
- Chapter 4: Discovery and strategy for AI products
- Chapter 9: Prove it paid off: outcomes, economics, and pricing
- Chapter 14: Get the job: the AI PM interview loop