Strategy question

Should YouTube Shorts be separated from the YouTube app? If yes, why? If no, why?

Practice this question out loud. An AI interviewer asks it, follows up like a real interviewer would, and scores your answer. Type or speak.

Start a mock interview on this question · Mock interview from a job description

What this question tests

Strategic reasoning on product architecture, weighing cannibalization, discovery, and competitive positioning.

How to approach it

  1. State the core tension: keeping Shorts inside YouTube leverages the existing audience and ad infrastructure, while separating it could sharpen competitive positioning against TikTok.
  2. Assess the case for keeping it integrated: cross promotion from long form to Shorts drives discovery, and a single app increases total time spent and ad inventory.
  3. Assess the case for separating it: a dedicated app could iterate faster on short form specific features and attract a younger audience who prefer app native short form experiences.
  4. Weigh the business reality: YouTube's ad business benefits from combined time spent and unified measurement, which a split would fragment.
  5. Recommend staying integrated, since the cross promotion and combined engagement value likely outweighs the faster iteration benefit of a separate app.
  6. Define success as Shorts driving measurable growth in overall YouTube watch time and new user acquisition, not just Shorts specific metrics.

What a strong answer includes

Common mistakes

Likely follow-up questions

More strategy questions

More questions from these companies

Learn the skill behind it

Chapters of the AI PM course that teach what this question tests.

Preparing for a specific role?

Book summaries for this kind of question

Browse all 4,000+ questions in the bank