Product design question

Design a product to make using Apple devices safer for its users.

Practice this question out loud. An AI interviewer asks it, follows up like a real interviewer would, and scores your answer. Type or speak.

What this question tests

Cross company product design requiring a clear scope decision and understanding of a real, known threat model.

Clarify the ambiguity: this is likely misattributed, but interpret it as designing a Meta product to help make using Apple devices safer, for example a security focused feature for Meta apps running on iOS.
Identify the real threat model: phishing links, account takeover attempts, and scam messages are the dominant safety risks for users on any device, including Apple's.
Segment users: less tech savvy users most vulnerable to phishing and scams versus power users who mainly want privacy controls.
Prioritize phishing and scam protection, since it's the highest frequency, highest harm risk across device types.
Propose in app link scanning before opening external links from messages, plus a simplified security checkup prompting weak passwords or unrecognized login alerts.
Define success as reduction in reported account takeovers and phishing related support tickets among affected users.

Resolves the prompt's likely mismatched company attribution by stating the interpretation clearly rather than guessing silently.
Focuses on the actual dominant threat, phishing and account takeover, rather than vague general safety.
Gives an illustrative number, for example assuming a 20 percent reduction in phishing related support tickets after in app link scanning launches.
Proposes a concrete, checkable feature, a simplified security checkup, rather than generic more safety messaging.

Not addressing the odd company or product attribution at all, leaving the answer's scope unclear.
Proposing generic safety advice, like use strong passwords, without a concrete product feature.

How would you balance security friction against user convenience in the login flow?
How would you measure whether users actually understood and acted on security warnings?